Numbers that withstand scrutiny.
Investors and lenders will stress every assumption. A model that breaks under questioning — or a valuation you cannot defend — costs you credibility and, often, the deal.
We agree the questions the model must answer and the key drivers, sourced from your data and the market.
A formula-driven, auditable model with clean inputs, transparent logic and clear outputs.
DCF and market approaches reconciled into a defensible range — the football field a counterparty respects.
Scenario and sensitivity tables that show how the answer moves with the assumptions that matter.
A walkthrough so you own the narrative, plus a model you can keep using.
Models built to bank and credit-committee standards — formula-driven, auditable and defensible — by someone who has sat on the lending side and knows exactly where a credit officer will push.
Institutional best practice — separation of inputs, calculations and outputs; consistent formulas; full auditability; and clear documentation. The output is something an analyst on the other side can follow.
Yes. We review for structural integrity, formula errors and hidden assumptions, and rebuild where the foundations are unsound.
It depends on the asset and the audience. We typically run several methods and reconcile them, because a single number rarely convinces a sophisticated counterparty.
Yes — clarity and handover are part of the deliverable, so you can update and defend it after we finish.